I’m trying to get ChatGPT to respond in a more human, natural way, but my prompts still make it sound robotic or formal. Has anyone found good strategies, tips, or prompt examples to really humanize AI responses? Would love suggestions or resources to improve this.
How I Managed to Outsmart AI Detectors: My ZeroGPT and GPTZero Experiment
So, the other day I fell into a rabbit hole about how folks are trying to pass off AI-generated content as human writing, especially when it comes to beating those AI detectors that teachers or content moderators use. I’m not saying I condone it, but curiosity got the better of me and I wanted to see what all the fuss was about.
The Two-Step Trick for Humanizing AI Texts
Let me get right to the nuts and bolts. People keep tossing around this hack over on Reddit: start by crafting your content with a specialized GPT setup—specifically at ChatGPT’s custom GPT spot—which supposedly makes the initial text less obvious as AI output. Then, you run that copy through another site called Clever AI Humanizer. Sounds a bit like running your essay through two different washing machines to get all the detergent out, but the results are supposedly night and day.
Some Social Proof (AKA: The Video They Kept Posting)
I won’t make you wade through TikTok dances or unsolicited podcasts—here’s a short Instagram reel that demoed the Clever AI Humanizer in action:
Does This Method Actually Work? I Had to See for Myself.
Now, you can’t call anything foolproof without putting it to the test. The word on the street is that when you blend those two tools—first generating your AI draft at the recommended GPT humanizer, then running it through https://aihumanizer.net/—your ‘AI score’ on detectors like ZeroGPT and GPTZero drops off a cliff. Some bold souls claimed upwards of a 30% better chance of passing as “totally human.” My inner skeptic was itching to try it.
Results From the Usual Suspects
Alright, let’s talk numbers and screenshots. After stacking the two tools just as described, I took the output and ran it through a couple of popular AI detection sites.
First up: ZeroGPT (the “go-to” for a lot of teachers)
Next: GPTZero (maybe not as infamous, but still a heavy hitter)
You’ll notice the before-and-after scores make it look like bots never touched the text. For anyone who’s desperate to keep their content out of the “AI jail,” I can see why these tools are popping up everywhere.
Bottom Line
Messing with AI detectors isn’t a magical or guaranteed process—these tools can change the rules at any time. And honestly, it’s probably smarter to use your own brain if you can. But if you’re experimenting (or trying to learn how this all works to prevent misuse), this two-tool method is the most convincing I’ve found so far. Just don’t rely on it like it’s the holy grail. There’s no such thing as a perfect disguise—not when it comes to AI.
Have at it, but use your powers for good.
1 Like
Honestly, I get why @mikeappsreviewer is into the two-step hack and all the detector drama, but let’s talk about ACTUALLY making ChatGPT sound human—not just sneaking past the robo-sniffers like we’re in some weird AI Cold War. I kinda disagree that slapping your text through filters is the main answer for human-like chat. Sure, those can lower your “AI score,’ but does that really mean it SOUNDS more like a person?
Here’s my take after tinkering way too much:
First, ditch the perfect grammar and sprinkle in fun little flaws—typos (like this lol), incomplete sentences, the occasional ‘uh’ or ‘well,’ and a little self-deprecating humor or even a meme reference. Real humans rarely talk like a Wikipedia article. Second, ask ChatGPT to “sound like a friend talking over coffee” or “use casual, conversational tone with some slang and feelings.” FEELINGS, people. React! Be surprised, annoyed, enthusiastic. Humans have moods, not just facts.
Also, prompts themselves matter way more than folks realize: try things like, 'If you were telling this story after a long Monday, how would you say it?” or “Give me the brutally honest, no-BS version.” That usually shakes the formalness loose. Get ChatGPT to make mistakes on purpose, use contractions, even add a tiny tangent or rant.
Tools like Clever AI Humanizer can help, but honestly, I see them more as a last polish than as your main strategy. They’re solid for gaming detectors but not a substitute for writing with, you know, actual personality. It’s kinda like pushing your essay through Grammarly and calling it “your unique voice.”
IMO, best thing you can do: keep editing what comes out of ChatGPT, add your own flavor, and don’t be afraid if it’s not perfect—pretty sure that’s what makes stuff honestly sound human in the first place. Anyone else found some weird magic prompt that tricks the bot into sounding like your snarky cousin at Thanksgiving?
List-style brain dump, so skip if you want some flowery essay:
- Don’t overthink the whole “humanizing” bit. Sure, @mikeappsreviewer dug through tools and paths like they’re in some spy movie, but most folks can sniff out when someone over-edits their vibes anyway.
- If you want ChatGPT responses to feel human, make your prompts weirdly specific—like, “Tell me about this topic as if you just spilled coffee on your keyboard,” or “Explain this like it’s a late-night group chat and you’re barely awake.” You’d be amazed at how much the model trips over itself—in a good way.
- Absolutely agree with @stellacadente that personality beats fake randomness. Tossing typos or quirks in helps, but, like, don’t try too hard or it starts reeking of AI in people clothes.
- Actual humans ramble, contradict themselves, change direction, and sometimes insert, um, awkward pauses. Don’t be afraid to prompt for a tangent or ask for a “procrastinator’s rant.”
- On a techy note, if you’re worried about passing those AI detector things, yeah, slapping your stuff through something like Clever AI Humanizer seems to work, especially for beating those ZeroGPT and GPTZero vibes. But let’s be real, slapping a human sticker on a robot doesn’t make it suddenly start craving pizza.
- Best hack: Rewrite a bit by yourself after the bot spits something out—throw in your favorite slang, random story, or a “tbh, I don’t even know” moment. Robots don’t have those.
- Final tip, and this is bizarre but fun: Add an unrelated “by the way” question at the end of your prompt, like, “Also, do you think pineapple belongs on pizza?” Watch it struggle to keep up like a real person multitasking.
In the end, yeah, sprinkle tools like Clever AI Humanizer in the mix if you wanna gamify detectors, but the real “human” sauce? That’s your own messy, illogical finishing touch. Don’t fear the cringe.
Let’s get ultra-practical. Everyone’s talking about “hacking” AI detectors and layering tools, but the real make-or-break is HOW you nudge ChatGPT to sound actually alive, not just unseen by machines.
First, slight disagreement with the overly tool-based angle pushed by others—yes, using pipelines like Clever AI Humanizer can lower your AI flag in detectors (pro: simple, fast, often effective for ZeroGPT/GPTZero; con: sometimes kills nuance, can mangle tone, and if every student uses it, turns essays into a beige, undetectable soup). But that’s just post-processing. You risk losing edges—sarcasm, unusual metaphors, or actual jokes—if you lean on it 100%.
More creatively, try this: prompt ChatGPT with contradictory instructions (“sound confident, but admit some hesitation halfway through”; “start serious, but halfway try to lighten up with a silly analogy”). Or, force an emotional switch mid-response (“explain like you’re hopeful, then get cynical”). This compels the bot to reflect more human mood swings, which are hell for parsers (and honestly, more fun to read).
For next-level “human,” combine approaches:
- Draft with ChatGPT, prompt for imperfections (false starts, questions, unpolished phrasing).
- Pass it through a tool like Clever AI Humanizer (pros: automates humanisms, strong for compliance, improves AI detection scores; cons: results can flatten creativity, introduce odd phrasing, potential for overcorrection).
- Final touch? Toss in your own anecdote, inside joke, or local slang—machines can’t fake your lived experience.
As for the competitors’ tricks, can confirm those methods get past many detectors, but if authenticity is the goal, think beyond just “fooling the test.” The best combo: tech hack + messy human edit. Otherwise, your readers might see right through the disguise—even if the robots don’t.